I’d just walked out of a Cambridge Math interview, and my brain was doing that thing where it replays every single second on a loop, except each replay somehow finds a new way to make me look worse. “What about that question on the second paper, why did I freeze on that. Was I too nervous. Did I even speak in full sentences or just vaguely gesture at ideas. Was this whole trip, the flights, the hotel, the money, worth it.” That kind of spiral.

And underneath all the spiralling, I already knew the actual answer. I hadn’t performed to my potential. I’d accepted that quietly, somewhere around baggage claim, and was now just doing the polite internal coping thing. It’s fine, let’s see how it goes. Even if it doesn’t work out, the experience was worth it. You know the script. Everyone runs it at some point.

My dad calls, snaps me out of the spiral for a few minutes. Good distraction. Then I hang up and look at the departure board like a man checking if his luck could possibly get worse.

It could. Delayed three hours.

Which meant I’d land with zero sleep and walk straight into an A-Level exam at school. Brilliant. A headache was already setting in, somewhere between exhaustion, overstimulation, and the specific kind of nausea you get from being in an airport too long.

I got up, splashed water on my face in the bathroom like that was going to fix anything, and on the walk back to my gate, passed a bookstore.

Three hours to kill. Why not.

The book I almost didn’t buy

I grabbed something off the shelf without thinking much about it. Genuinely assumed it was self-improvement book number 252 in a sea of identical spines and appealing covers, all promising the same six habits in a slightly different font.

Read the blurb. It said philosophy, not self-help. Mildly interesting, not enough to change my expectations. I paid, boarded, and slept the second I sat down, because at that point my body had given up negotiating.

Landed. Wrote the exam while being sleep deprived, which is its own special kind of out-of-body experience. Life continued.

Hitting the bottom of it

A few weeks later, exams were finally over, and so was whatever was holding me together during them. I was sitting in what I can comfortably call the worst stretch of my life so far. Internal restlessness that wouldn’t switch off. The strange, specific misery of getting everything you said you wanted and still feeling completely empty. Feeling cheated by people that I thought loved me. Feeling abandoned in ways I couldn’t fully explain to anyone, including myself.

So I figured, fine, nothing left to lose, let me crack open this book I bought out of boredom and abandon it after ten pages like every other self-slop book.

Ten pages in, I did exactly what I predicted.

I dropped the book.

But not because it was boring. Because it had said something that genuinely stopped me. It opened by claiming there’s no such thing as trauma, that you are not a product of your past.

I disagreed with this so violently that I picked it back up the next morning purely to dismantle the argument.

Read more. Disagreed less.

By day three I caught myself thinking, quietly, almost against my will, “maybe this is actually right.”

By the final page, I wasn’t just convinced. I was rebuilt.

Why this book was different

Here’s what actually separated it from the 251 books before it.

It explained, with unsettling precision, exactly how my mind worked. The mechanisms behind the restlessness, the dissatisfaction, all of it. But it didn’t stop at explanation, which is where every self-help book quietly bows out and hands you a worksheet instead.

It gave me the actual solution.
Just one.
Courage.

Which sounds almost insultingly simple. I know. I rolled my eyes too.

But I’d genuinely never encountered it stated this plainly anywhere in the entire self-help ecosystem, across hundreds of hours of content.

And once I thought about why, the reason became obvious.

Courage can’t be sold.
You hear it once, and that’s the whole transaction.
From that point on, you either use it and confront the actual fear in front of you, or you don’t.

There’s no follow-up course.
No companion workbook.
No twelve-part podcast series unpacking it further, because there’s nothing left to unpack.

It’s a single decision that belongs entirely to you, and nobody, no matter how good their marketing, can make it on your behalf.

The book didn’t replace self-help.
It just quietly exposed why none of it had ever actually worked.

What actually happened after

So what came out of all this. A lot, honestly.

My ego, which had been running the show for years, more or less dissolved, and the jealousy that used to creep in constantly just... stopped. I started writing publicly, which is the only reason you’re reading this right now. I broke addictions that self-help had somehow made worse instead of better, despite years of trying. My relationships, especially the romantic ones, finally started making sense.

None of that came from the book directly. It didn’t hand me a love life fix or an addiction protocol. It didn’t give me a single insight to apply. What it did was lay everything out without a single contradiction, which if you’ve spent any real time in self-help, you’ll know is genuinely rare. And then it simply told me the choice was mine. Choose courage, confront the fear, or don’t.

The book, if you’re wondering, was The Courage to Be Disliked. Every line in it holds up under scrutiny. Nothing in it contradicts itself three chapters later, which is more than I can say for most of what’s sold under that genre.

Here’s the part I actually want you to take from all this.

You can only fix your own life. Not a podcast, not an insight, not me, not this newsletter. Self-help survives by selling you information in installments, because the moment it told you the whole truth in one sentence, you’d never need to buy the next thing. Courage doesn’t work that way. There’s no recurring subscription to it. There’s just the decision, sitting in front of you, completely free, completely yours, and completely uncomfortable.

That book didn’t sell me anything. It just stopped lying to me long enough for me to see that the choice had been mine the entire time.

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Leave a comment

Share

“That wasn’t me, I was just angry.”
“My emotions got the best of me.”
“I didn’t mean it, that’s not who I am.”

And here’s the thing that should bother you about that sentence. The exact same person who says this about themselves will turn around and watch someone else snap at a waiter, or ghost a friend, or lash out under pressure, and think: well, that says everything about who they really are.

Same behaviour.
Two completely different verdicts.

One gets explained away as a malfunctioning part.
The other gets read as the whole truth of a person’s character.

That double standard is the actual subject of this letter. Not some abstract idea about “interconnectedness.” A specific, sneaky habit your mind runs constantly, and almost nobody notices it happening.

The loophole nobody admits to using

When you mess up, you fragment yourself on purpose. Suddenly there’s “you,” and then there’s “the anger that took over,” as if anger is a separate tenant living in your head who occasionally grabs the wheel without asking. Your mind, your emotions, your impulses get treated like unreliable employees you’re not responsible for managing.

But you’d never extend that same generosity to anyone else. When someone else loses their temper, you don’t think “their anger acted.” You think “they did that.” Full stop. No separation between the person and the moment.

This isn’t a small inconsistency. It’s a loophole, and you’re using it constantly, probably without realising it. For other people, every action is identity. For yourself, every uncomfortable action is an exception. It’s the most convenient double standard a mind can construct, because it lets you keep all the credit for your good moments while quietly outsourcing the bad ones to a part of you that supposedly isn’t really you.

Here’s the uncomfortable bit. Your anger didn’t act. Your tiredness didn’t act. Your “trigger” didn’t act.

You did. All of you, at once, the way you always do.

Why fragmenting yourself actually costs you control

This matters for a reason that has nothing to do with guilt or self-improvement guilt-tripping.

If your anger is a separate part that occasionally hijacks you, then you have no real way to work with it. It just happens, and you survive it, and you apologise after. But if your anger is you, fully and completely, then it’s something you can actually understand, predict, and shape. You can ask why it shows up when it does. You can notice the pattern before it fires. You can change your relationship to it.

The fragmenting feels like it protects you. It doesn’t. It just removes your hands from the wheel.

Think about how this plays out somewhere completely ordinary, like a group project gone wrong. One person says “I did my part, the deadline issue wasn’t on me.” Another says “I delivered exactly what was asked, the communication breakdown isn’t my responsibility.” Everyone is technically correct about their individual contribution. And the project still fails, because nobody’s holding the whole thing. Everyone optimised their fragment and the outcome still fell apart.

That’s what happens when you manage yourself the same way. You can have a disciplined morning routine, a stable career, a calm exterior, every individual piece performing fine. And still feel like something is fundamentally not working, because you’ve never claimed the whole of yourself. You’ve only ever claimed the parts that were easy to claim.

What changes when you stop splitting yourself in two

The shift isn’t complicated, even if it’s uncomfortable. It’s the difference between saying “this part is me, that part isn’t” and simply saying “it was all me.”

Not as self-punishment.
Not as an excuse to spiral into guilt.
Just as an accurate description of what happened.

Because the second you own the whole of it, anger included, fear included, the messy and reactive bits included, you actually get something useful in return. You get the ability to do something about it.

You can’t fix what you’ve disowned.
You can only fix what you’ve claimed.

That’s really it. No grand transformation required. Just the willingness to stop quietly excusing yourself with the exact language you’d never accept from anyone else.

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Everything I’d hidden inside during lockdown had kept me comfortable in its own weird way. Video games all day. No social pressure. No having to be anyone. A growing p*rn addiction.

And then suddenly, like a switch flipped, all of it was gone. School reopened. People expected things from me again. I had to speak in full sentences to actual humans, navigate social rules I’d completely forgotten, sit through classes without a screen to retreat to. My dopamine was wrecked. Everything felt loud and unfamiliar and vaguely threatening.

So how did teenage me handle this? The same way a lot of us did. I fell headfirst into self-improvement. Discipline over motivation. Delayed gratification. Deep work. Cold showers. The whole ecosystem. And honestly, it helped. I’m not going to pretend it didn’t. I got physically fit, climbed to the top of my class, stopped being completely useless in conversation. Real results. Real progress.

But there was a trap I was walking into, and I didn’t see it yet.

Years passed. I was still watching the same creators, reading more books, listening to two or three podcasts a day. And somewhere along the way I noticed something uncomfortable: my external results had plateaued, but my internal world was still restless. Almost frantic, actually. Like it was constantly scanning for the next insight that would finally fix something it couldn’t name. The content kept coming. The feeling didn’t go away.

Today, I haven’t watched a self-help video in years. I listen to one podcast occasionally. And I haven’t felt better in my life.

So what actually happened?

Self-help saved my external life. And ruined the internal life.

It saved my external life. My outputs, my habits, my productivity, my body. All real. All genuinely useful.

And then it quietly ruined my internal life. Because all it ever did was fix symptoms. It never went near the root.

Here’s an example.

There’s a piece of advice that circulates constantly in self-help: never show all your cards. Always present the best version of yourself. Keep people slightly uncertain about who you really are. It gets framed as strategy, as confidence, as playing the game intelligently.

Now imagine that advice landing on someone who is afraid that people don’t accept them. Someone who already suspects that if people saw the real them, they’d leave. Someone who already plays personas as a defence mechanism and secretly hates themselves for it.

That advice doesn’t challenge them. It validates them. It says: yes, what you’re doing is correct. Your fear is justified. You never have to confront it. Just keep performing and call it strategy.

My symptom was “people don’t fully accept me.”

My actual problem was a deep fear of being seen.

What did self-help do? It handed me a more sophisticated way to hide, dressed it up as wisdom, and let me walk away feeling like I’d learned something.

The real answer, the one nobody was selling, was simpler and far more terrifying: be yourself. If they don’t accept that, they just don’t like the real you, and that’s fine. Many people will. But you’ll never find them while wearing a mask.

Labels without ladders

The other thing self-help did brilliantly, for me at least, was give me labels for my problems. Attachment styles. Trauma responses. Cognitive distortions. Nervous system dysregulation.

And then just... leave me there. Here’s the name of your cage. Good luck.

And I’ll take some blame for this too, because my dumbass brain, and probably yours, did that thing where naming a problem feels like solving it. Oh, I’m anxious-avoidant. Right, yes. That explains everything. Sorted.

Except nothing was sorted.

Take attachment styles, which we went deep on last week. You can read every book on anxious attachment, understand exactly why you overthink and seek reassurance, trace it all the way back to moments in childhood where love felt conditional. Fascinating. Genuinely useful to understand.

But understanding it doesn’t change what you do at 11pm when the person you love hasn’t replied and your nervous system starts running its old programme. The label describes the pattern. It doesn’t break it. Breaking it requires going into the situations that terrify you, again and again, and choosing differently. That’s not something a framework can do for you. It’s not something a creator can sell you.

Because what’s actually required is courage. And courage isn’t a concept. It’s something you either do or you don’t.

What actually changed things for me

I stopped. All of it. The creators, the books, the podcasts, the reels, everything.

And then I read one book on Adlerian psychology, which did something no self-help content had ever done: it told me, plainly, that it couldn’t save me. That the only path forward was confronting my own fears with my own courage. It laid out what those fears probably were. And then it essentially said: the rest is yours.

No blueprint. No routine. No stack.

Just me and a list of things I’d been avoiding for years.

Fear of expressing desire. Fear of uncertainty. Fear of social friction. Fear of being judged. Fear of abandonment. Fear of leaning on someone and having them not hold the weight.

I had to walk into each of those fears and many more, one at a time, repeatedly, until they lost their grip. Some days it felt like my soul was trying to exit my body from the sheer discomfort of it. No exaggeration. Just the raw, unglamorous experience of doing the frightening thing and surviving it, and then doing it again.

It took years. It got better slowly. There was no moment of breakthrough. Just a gradual accumulation of evidence that I could handle more than I thought.

So if you’re sitting there thinking: okay, what do I actually do

Stop consuming. All of it. No books, no videos, no podcasts, no reels, no “just this one last thing that might finally give me what I need.” Unsubscribe from this newsletter too if you want to. I mean that genuinely.

Cut the stimulation. Sit in the quiet that’s left. It’ll feel unbearable at first, which is exactly how you know it’s the right thing.

Write down your problems. All of them. And then go deeper, because every surface problem has a fear underneath it. Work your way down. Talk to someone you actually trust if that helps, a friend, a family member, someone who knows you well enough to be honest with you.

And then go do the things that trigger those fears. Not once. Over and over. Clumsily. Imperfectly. Scared.

That’s the whole thing. There’s no more elegant version of it.

It’s terrifying. But that’s the price.
And unlike everything else you’ve been buying, this one actually works.

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

If you’re here, you’ve probably already done the rounds. Anxious. Avoidant. Secure. And then the niche ones: anxious-preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant, fearful-avoidant, counter-dependent. You’ve watched the podcasts, read the books, maybe even taken a few quizzes that gave you a four-paragraph breakdown of why you are the way you are in relationships.

I know because I did all of it too.

And I kept running into the same problem. I couldn’t box myself into a single one. I had symptoms of all of them, depending on the relationship, depending on the day, depending on how safe I felt. And every time I tried to pin it down, something didn’t fit. So I stopped digging and figured maybe I was just complicated.

A few years later I took a different path entirely. I found Adlerian psychology, which looks at behaviour not as a symptom of what happened to you, but as something you’re actively doing for a reason. And suddenly the whole attachment style framework clicked in a way it never had before. Not because I finally found the right label. But because I finally understood what all the labels were pointing at.

The thing underneath all of them

Here’s what I think nobody says clearly enough.

Your attachment style isn’t a personality type. It isn’t who you are. It’s an adaptation. A strategy you developed as a kid to deal with one specific thing: the feeling of being abandoned by the people who were supposed to love you unconditionally.

That’s it. That’s the whole thing.

And before you say “my parents were good parents, I wasn’t abandoned,” hear me out. Because abandonment doesn’t just mean someone left. It means any moment where, as a child, you felt like love was conditional. Like it could be withdrawn. Like you had to earn it, perform for it, shrink yourself to keep it, or brace yourself because it might disappear anyway.

That feeling, however it arrived, is what your attachment style is a response to. Every anxious behaviour, every avoidant wall, every push-pull dynamic, all of it is just a different answer to the same original question:

how do I make sure I don’t get abandoned again?

Still don’t believe me?

Take anxious attachment.

The fear of being left behind, the overthinking, the hypervigilance, the constant need for reassurance, the people pleasing, the over-communicating. Run the abandonment hypothesis through each one and it fits perfectly.

Why the fear of being left behind? Because you were, or felt like you were, as a kid.

Why the hypervigilance? Because you’re scanning for early signs so you can intervene before they leave again.

Why the low self-esteem in relationships? Because somewhere along the way you learned that being fully yourself was risky, that being “too much” might be the thing that makes them leave. So you minimise. You adapt. You become whoever the relationship seems to need.

Every single behaviour is downstream from one thing: the terror of abandonment.

Now take avoidant attachment. Same wound, completely different adaptation. You were abandoned, or felt like you were, and you drew a different conclusion.

You decided that depending on people was the problem.

That if you never fully leaned in, you could never fully fall. So you became self-sufficient to a fault. You pull away after intimacy not because you don’t care, but because unconditional love was never really modelled for you, and the closer things get, the more certain you are that something is about to be taken away. Cynicism toward relationships isn’t coldness. It’s just your lived experience, dressed up as a worldview.

Two completely different people. Two completely different behaviours. One shared root.

Why love and abandonment are the same conversation

Here’s the connection that actually matters.

A child doesn’t need perfect parents. They need to feel like the love is unconditional. Like it isn’t going anywhere regardless of what they do, how they behave, whether they’re easy or difficult or loud or needy. That feeling, of being loved without having to earn it, is what gives a child the security to just... exist.

Without strategy. Without performance. Without constantly checking whether they’re still okay.

When that feeling is absent, even partially, even accidentally, the child doesn’t think “my parent is struggling.” They think “I am not safe.”

And then they build a system to manage that unsafety.

Some kids chase reassurance.
Some kids build walls.
Some kids do both depending on the day.

Those systems follow us into adulthood. And we bring them into every relationship we have, running old code in new situations, wondering why things keep going the same way.

The label we give the system is the attachment style. But the system itself is just a child’s best attempt to survive the feeling that love might not be unconditional after all.

Where to go from here

I want to be honest with you: there’s no clean fix for this. Anyone selling you a six-step process to “heal your attachment style” is selling you the same repackaged comfort we talked about last week.

But here’s what I think actually moves the needle.

First, just recognise the adaptation for what it is. Not a flaw, not a diagnosis, not who you are. A strategy. A very old, very understandable strategy that made complete sense when you built it. It protected you. It just doesn’t serve you the same way anymore.

Second, find the belief underneath it. Because every attachment behaviour is protecting a belief. Usually something like “I am too much,” or “people always leave eventually,” or “depending on someone means getting hurt.” That belief isn’t a fact. It’s a conclusion a child drew from limited information, and it’s been running quietly in the background ever since.

And third, and this is the hard part: you have to choose to love differently before it feels safe to do so. Because it never fully feels safe. The security you’re waiting for before you’ll let someone in, that isn’t coming from outside. It has to come from deciding, consciously, to extend trust before you have guarantees.

That’s not a technique. That’s courage. The specific kind that doesn’t feel heroic at all. Just quietly terrifying. The choice to stay open when everything in you is screaming to close, because a child who got hurt a long time ago is still running the show.

You get to tell that child that you’ve got it from here. :)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Two kids. Same house, same parents, same neighbourhood, same arguments bleeding through the walls at night. One grows up anxious and avoidant. The other grows up driven and oddly good at reading a room.

“Yeah but no two people experience the same environment the same way.”

Okay, fair. Let’s make it even simpler then.

Same classroom. Thirty kids, same teacher, same syllabus, same four walls for eight hours a day. One kid decides school is a place where they get humiliated and stops trying. Another decides it’s a place where effort gets rewarded and leans in harder. Another decides the whole thing is a game and learns to work around it. Thirty kids, thirty completely different experiences of the identical situation.

“Yeah but they all had different home lives.”

Sure. But you see the problem with that argument, right?

You keep adding variables to protect the idea that environment is the cause.

First it’s the classroom, then it’s the home, then it’s the neighbourhood, then it’s genetics.

At some point you have to ask: if we need that many variables to explain why two people turned out differently, maybe environment isn’t actually doing the heavy lifting we think it is.

So clearly, something else is going on.

Here’s what that something else is.

The story your brain tells about you

Your brain doesn’t store your life like a hard drive. It doesn’t keep a clean, chronological record of everything that happened to you. It stores stories, fragments, impressions. And it doesn’t retrieve them equally. It retrieves selectively, based on what it’s currently looking for.

And what is it looking for?

Whatever confirms who you currently believe yourself to be.

You’ve probably heard “you are a product of your past.” You’ve maybe even heard the self-help rebuttal: “you are not a product of your past.” But here’s what neither of them say: your past is a product of you. The present you. The you that exists right now, with the identity you’ve chosen and the story you’ve decided to live inside.

Your mind goes into your memory bank and cherry-picks. It finds the moments that fit the narrative and quietly buries the ones that don’t. Then it hands you the result and says: see? This is why you are the way you are. This is the evidence.

And you, quite reasonably, believe it.

The identity you chose first

Let me make this concrete.

Growing up, I was never “the smart one” in the room. That was someone else’s title and I’d accepted that early. So when I looked back at my childhood, you know what memories showed up? Every time I blanked on an answer in class. Every time someone else got praised for something I’d also worked on. Every exam I’d done worse than expected. My mind had built a neat little case for me, going all the way back to primary school.

Except... I also used to spend hours pulling apart how things worked just because I was curious. I’d reread chapters not because I had to but because I wanted to understand them properly. I’d argue with teachers when something didn’t make sense to me. Thinking about it now, it is not exactly the behaviour of someone who isn’t engaged.

Those memories existed too. They just didn’t get called to the stand. Because they didn’t fit the identity I’d already chosen.

The identity came first. The past assembled itself around it like a supporting cast.

Almost like the mind makes a case for the identity you choose.

Causality, or the trick your mind plays

Most of us look at our past and treat it as causality. These things happened, therefore I became this person. It feels true. It feels like the only logical reading of events.

But what if the arrow is pointing the other way?

What if you decided, at some point, who you were going to be... and then your mind went and found the receipts?

Your memories are real. Your experiences genuinely shaped you. But the specific ones you’ve built your identity on, the ones that feel like the foundation of who you are, those were chosen. Not consciously, not maliciously, but chosen nonetheless. By the present you, to justify the present you.

Which brings us back to those kids in the classroom. Same teacher, same syllabus, same four walls. They just made different choices, mostly without realising it, about who they were going to be. And then each of them found a past that proved it.

You are not a product of your environment.
You are not a product of your past.
You are a product of your choices.

Including the choice of which memories count to make you and your current story and identity.

So what do you do with this

Sit with it for a second before you do anything.

Because this cuts both ways.

It means you’re not trapped by what happened to you.

But it also means you can’t keep using what happened to you as the reason you are the way you are.

The past you’ve been pointing at as your explanation? You built that. You chose the identity, and the memories lined up behind it like loyal soldiers.

The slightly terrifying and genuinely freeing thing is this: if you can choose an identity that assembles one version of your past, you can choose a different identity and watch your past quietly rearrange itself around that too.

Not by lying to yourself. Not by pretending the hard things didn’t happen. But by deciding what they mean. By choosing which memories get to be foundational and which ones have just been squatting there, taking up space they were never entitled to.

Your past is not the author of your story.

You are. You always were. You just didn’t know you were writing it the whole time. :)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Fed up with where I was, desperate for something to change. So where did that lead me? YouTube (duh lol). A few searches later, I was subscribed to at least ten self-improvement channels. And that number only grew. Soon my entire feed was nothing but productivity tips, morning routines, and guys with suspiciously good jawlines telling me to wake up at 5am.

You can probably relate to this.

And look, it works. In the beginning, it genuinely works. You go to the gym more often. Your confidence picks up. You get more productive, fix your sleep, even rewire your dopamine system apparently. You lock in. Monk mode. All that. It feels like nothing in the world can’t be fixed with the right insight and enough discipline.

That’s exactly how I felt. My grades got better, I got more physically fit, my mind felt clearer. The results were coming in. So I didn’t need those videos anymore, right?

But I kept returning. Always with the same justification: “it’s better than scrolling anyway.”

A few years later, I can tell you... it isn’t. Not really. Because at some point it stopped improving me. And I kept watching it anyway.

Not for the growth. For the feeling.

Warm, familiar, comfortable.

No different from any other slop you find on the internet.

I’d just convinced myself it was noble slop.

The uncomfortable question

Here’s what I want you to sit with.

If the self-improvement content actually worked... why do you still watch it?

You’ve improved. You’ve seen the progress, got the results, built the habits.

“But improvement is a continual thing.”

Sure.

But you don’t need fifty more productivity tips. You know it all. You’ve already optimised for it. The creators are posting the same content repackaged in slightly different thumbnails, and you know this deep down, and you keep going back anyway.

Why?

Because self-improvement became your comfort zone. I know that sounds backwards. You’re out of your comfort zone every day, right? Doing hard things, building discipline, all of it. But try this: live a week without the content. No podcasts, no reels about habits, no videos about becoming your best self. Just you and your actual life.

That’s the uncomfortable thing. Not the 5am wake-up. That.

You were never uncomfortable to begin with

Here’s the part nobody in self-help will say to you, because it would kill their business.

Think back to why you started. You didn’t bravely step outside your comfort zone and choose growth from a place of strength. You got so sick of your current situation that it became uncomfortable to stay in it. So you ran. Toward something certain, structured, familiar. Something comfortable almost. Toward self-improvement.

You traded one comfort zone for another. The old situation became too uncomfortable even for you, so you found a new comfortable place and called it growth. But running toward comfort is still running toward comfort, regardless of how many cold showers are involved.

The thing self-help gets completely right: growth only comes from outside the comfort zone.

True.

But here’s where it quietly goes wrong: it builds a comfort zone around itself. A warm little ecosystem of insights and frameworks and creators who feel like friends. And you live inside it and call it growth because the content is about growth.

You’ve never truly been uncomfortable. You’ve just redecorated.

Then I found something that actually bothered me

Now where did my journey go from there?

I stumbled onto this guy called Alfred Adler. Contemporary of Freud, largely ignored, which should’ve been the first sign he was onto something.

And one idea of his genuinely unsettled me in a way that no productivity video ever did.

He said that people don’t do things because of what happened to them.

They do things because of what those things mean to them, and what they’re trying to achieve by doing them.

(Aka your environment/past doesn’t define you. The meaning you give it does.)

Which sounds simple until you turn it on yourself and ask: what am I actually trying to achieve by consuming all this content?

Not the answer you give out loud. The real one.

For me, it was control. If I just had the right framework, the right system, the right insight, I’d finally feel safe enough to actually live. The content wasn’t a launchpad. It was a waiting room. And I kept sitting in it, convinced I was almost ready.

Adler would call that a life-lie. A story that feels like wisdom but functions like avoidance. And the only thing that breaks it isn’t another insight.

It’s courage. The specific kind that doesn’t feel heroic at all. The courage to put the content down, step into your actual life without a map, and find out what you do when no one is giving you instructions.

That’s the step outside the comfort zone that self-help will never ask you to take. Because if you took it, you wouldn’t need it anymore. :)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

A few years ago, I had a favourite mug. Nothing fancy. Slightly chipped, held heat just right, the kind of thing you don’t think about until it’s gone. One morning, half-asleep, I knocked it off the counter. It shattered instantly. Felt sad for a bit. But what I had to do was clear. Broken things are easy. You sweep them up and move on.

Later that week, luck wasn’t on my side and a different mug cracked. Just a thin line along the side. It still worked. Still held coffee. Still mattered. And that’s when the problem started.

Do I keep using it?
Do I try to fix it?
Do I replace it before it breaks completely?

The shattered mug asked nothing of me.
The cracked one demanded a decision.

That’s the difference between hate and love. And I think most people have it backwards.

Why hate is actually easier

Hate looks heavier than love. It isn’t.

Hate is clean. It has edges. It makes decisions for you. If someone hates you, you don’t need to manage the relationship, nurture the connection, or explain yourself carefully. They’ve already chosen distance. And here’s the part people rarely say out loud: hate resolves itself. Either the person softens over time as you remain yourself, or they fade out entirely. Both outcomes reduce friction. Hate doesn’t require maintenance. It doesn’t ask you to be precise or emotionally calibrated.

It’s the shattered mug. Clear, final, simple.

Love isn’t any of those things.

It isn’t clear, it isn’t final, and it definitely isn’t simple.

Love is harder because it matters

Love is the cracked mug. It still holds something valuable, which means now you have responsibility.

You have to notice tone. You have to adjust timing. You have to hold honesty and care at the same time without letting either one collapse the other. Too much softness and love becomes dishonest. Too much truth and love becomes cruel. You can’t disappear, you can’t dominate, you can’t go numb and call it peace.

Love asks you to stay present.

To keep checking:
am I being kind, or just comfortable?
Am I being honest, or just harsh?
Am I protecting this, or slowly controlling it?

This is why love exhausts people. Not because it’s painful, but because it demands skill. And skill requires attention, constantly. Neglect turns love into resentment. Fear turns it into control. Silence turns it into misunderstanding. Hate never asks for this level of care. Love does, because love is alive. Alive things need tending. That’s not a flaw in love. It’s just the nature of anything that still matters.

The courage to love anyway

It takes courage to accept being hated.
But it takes more courage to love well.

To stay gentle without becoming weak. To speak truth without becoming sharp. To allow real closeness without trying to quietly own it. Most people drift toward emotional distance not because they’re cruel, but because it’s easier. Easier to throw the mug away than sit with the uncertainty of the crack. Easier to label someone than to understand them. Easier to harden than to hold.

But love is where growth actually happens. It’s where you’re forced to regulate yourself, to stay open when closing would feel so much safer.

And yes, loving means risking being misunderstood. It means risking loss, risking effort with no guarantee of return.
That’s the cost. Nobody tells you that clearly enough.

The courage isn’t in choosing love once.
It’s in choosing it again after disappointment, after fatigue, after the crack appears and you’re standing there deciding whether it’s still worth holding.

Hate ends the story quickly.
Love asks you to keep writing.
With care, with patience, with the quiet bravery to stay soft in a world that keeps handing you reasons not to :)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Search and rescue teams have a story they don’t like to share.

When they find bodies in the desert, there’s always something that doesn’t make sense. Something that stays with them long after the paperwork is filed and the debrief is done. Because the people didn’t die from what you’d expect.

Not heatstroke. Not snake bites. Not disorientation in a sandstorm.

They died of thirst.

Next to each body: water bottles.

Not empty. Not broken. Not leaking.

Full. Completely, absurdly, tragically full.

They didn’t die because the desert was merciless. They died because they were too afraid to use what they already had. Too terrified that drinking now meant having nothing later. So they rationed their salvation. Carefully, responsibly, strategically. Until it killed them.

I haven’t been able to stop thinking about that story. Because I don’t think it’s really about the desert.

The fear beneath the fear

Death is the one appointment that never gets cancelled. The final deadline that makes every other deadline feel a little silly.

But here’s something worth sitting with: is it actually death we fear?

Not really. If you trace the anxiety back far enough... it isn’t the stopping of breath that keeps people awake at 3am. It’s something quieter and more specific. The fear that when death comes, the story won’t have mattered. That we’ll be forgotten the moment we’re gone. That our existence will leave no mark on anything.

We don’t fear dying.
We fear having never truly lived.

And that fear, that specific flavour of it, converts into something. A hunger. The need to be significant, to know that someone somewhere is better off because you existed. To leave fingerprints on the world that won’t wash away.

Every human carries this. It’s not vanity. It’s one of the most fundamental things about us. We need to be seen, heard, missed, remembered. And there’s nothing wrong with that.

But significance is tricky. The more desperately you chase it, the more it seems to slip away. Because it can’t be manufactured or forced. It only ever emerges from authentic action. And authentic action requires vulnerability, risk, the real possibility of failure: the exact things that our fear makes us want to avoid.

The desert within

Here’s the thing. We are all carrying full water bottles in our own desert.

Your talents are a full bottle. Your compassion is a full bottle. Your capacity for connection, for honesty, for showing up for people, full bottles, every one of them. But we’re so afraid of running out that we refuse to drink.

“What if I try to help and make things worse? What if I give my heart to this person and they leave? What if I speak up and people think I’m unqualified? What if I use everything I have here and don’t have enough left for something bigger later?”

So we wait.
We plan.
We prepare.

Always getting ready to matter, never quite ready enough. We tell ourselves we’re being strategic, thoughtful, responsible. But really... we’re just scared. Scared that our best won’t be enough. Scared that we’ll spend everything we have and still not make the difference we dreamed of making.

The bottles stay full. The desert gets hotter.

The courage to be ordinary

The people in the desert would have survived if they’d simply drunk their water.

Like a normal person would. Not rationing it for some future emergency that never came, not saving it for a moment worthy enough to deserve it.
Just drinking it, because they were thirsty, because that’s what water is for.

That’s the whole thing, really.

The secret isn’t becoming extraordinary.
It’s having the courage to be ordinary.

To matter in small ways. Immediate ways. Imperfect ways. To help the person in front of you instead of saving yourself for some grand cause. To love someone complicated instead of waiting for someone simple. To create something flawed that actually works instead of dreaming endlessly about the ideal version. To say the true thing clumsily instead of waiting until you can say it perfectly.

That is how you cheat death.

Not by achieving something so large it survives you.

But by refusing to let the fear of dying keep you from living.

By drinking the water.
Sharing the gift.
Taking the risk.

By being brave enough to be present, imperfect, and real.

The bottles were never meant to be preserved. They were meant to be used. :)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

“The only thing I know is that I know nothing.”

Hold that thought. We’ll come back to it.

First, let’s talk about colouring.

Not the kind you did with crayons on cheap paper as a kid. I mean the colouring that happens long before thought. The kind that shapes your entire perception without ever asking for permission.

Same street. Different worlds.

Sarah and Daniel are walking home from work one evening, taking the same shortcut through the park. Same tired shoulders, same end-of-day silence in their heads.

Halfway through, a man steps out from behind a tree and asks them for directions. Perfectly ordinary. A little sudden, maybe.

Sarah’s stomach drops. Her pace quickens, keys already finding their way into her hand. She gives a clipped answer without making eye contact and moves on, heart still loud in her chest ten minutes later.

Daniel stops, pulls out his phone, and spends two minutes helping the man find his way. Waves goodbye. Continues home thinking about dinner.

Same moment. Same stranger. Same park.

One mind reads threat.
The other reads inconvenience.

Nothing about the man changed. Only the lens did. And here’s the thing, neither of them chose their reaction consciously.

It came before thought.
Before reasoning. Before any decision was made.

Sarah had been followed home once, three years ago. Daniel hadn’t.

That’s colouring. Not the event, but the layer of experience sitting on top of the event, quietly deciding what it means before you even get a say.

The courage to recolour

Your mind comes preloaded with old stories, and most of them arrived before you were old enough to fact-check them.

Maybe you were humiliated in front of people once, so feedback now lands like an attack.

Maybe someone you trusted left without warning, so casual honesty from others now feels suspicious.

Maybe love in your childhood was unpredictable, so stability now feels strangely unsafe, like you’re waiting for it to end.

The situation is neutral.
The colouring isn’t.

But here’s the quiet truth: just because your perception is tinted doesn’t mean you’re trapped inside it. Colouring can be changed. Recoloured. Not automatically, not in an instant, and not by simply deciding to see things differently. Every moment you pause before reacting, every moment you question the lens instead of the world, every moment you stay open when your body wants to close — you recolour. Just slightly, but you still do. You redraw the outline of how you see people, conflict, safety, yourself.

It takes effort.
It takes patience.
It takes a level of self-honesty that most people spend their whole lives avoiding.

And above all, it takes courage. The courage to not fully trust your first emotion. The courage to sit with discomfort instead of flinching away from it. The courage to rewrite reactions you didn’t choose, but have been living with anyway. The courage to try the unfamiliar.

Recolouring isn’t about pretending everything is fine. It’s about refusing to let old pigments decide the entire painting.

I am

Now let’s return to Aurelius.

“The only thing I know is that I know nothing.”

Beautiful. Humble. Precise.

But I want to push it gently.

Because what if even that knowing is coloured? What if the mind saying “I know nothing” is still working through concepts, language, memory — all of which were added after the canvas was already there?

Think of your earliest possible moment.

Before thought.
Before memory.
Before stories, fear, preference, name.
Before any of the experiences that would later become your lens for the world.

What would you know?

Not your history.
Not right from wrong.
Not the world’s dangers or its promises.

You would know only one thing:

”I am.”

That’s it. The simplest, most irreducible truth. The raw canvas beneath every layer of experience. Everything else: fear, love, caution, excitement, trauma, trust. Those arrive later, like strokes of paint applied by life. But the canvas underneath? It’s untouched. Always there. Almost like it’s waiting.

When you really sit with this, something shifts. Your identity isn’t your personality. It isn’t your colouring. It’s the canvas. The thing that exists before the lens is applied, before the stories begin, before the reactions became automatic.

And from that place, recolouring becomes possible.

The courage to return to the canvas

You’re coloured right now.
So am I.
Everyone is. And pretending otherwise is just another layer of paint.

But your colouring isn’t your destiny. Each time you pause and notice that a reaction feels a little too familiar, a little too much like something old showing up in something new — you make progress toward the canvas. And from that steadiness, you get to actually choose: which colours deserve to stay, which ones were inherited without your consent, and which ones you’re finally ready to set down.

Courage isn’t about pretending the old colours never existed. It’s about noticing the tint, and reaching for a new shade anyway.

The world will tell you your reactions are fixed. Your wiring is fixed. Your colouring is permanent.

But the canvas inside you knows something different.

You are not the painting. You are the painter.
Go pick up the colours and paint:)

If you enjoyed reading this letter, feel free to hit the like button so substack can show this letter to more people. And while you’re at it, drop your thoughts down below too:)

Let me guess.

You’ve read the books. Done the journaling. Fixed your sleep, your diet, maybe your morning routine. You’ve worked on yourself — genuinely worked — and from the outside, it shows. Things are better. You’re more productive, more disciplined, maybe more successful than you were two or three years ago.

And yet.

Something still feels off.

Not broken exactly, but not right either.

Like your car got faster, yet your seat is still uncomfortable. In fact, more uncomfortable.

And somewhere in the back of your head, a quiet voice keeps asking: Is this it? Is this the missing piece to the puzzle?

That itch. That’s why you’re here.

This letter isn’t for everyone

If you’re looking for motivation, you won’t find it here.

If you need someone to give you permission to chase your dreams or remind you that you’re capable, there are thousands of newsletters for that, and they’re very good at it.

If you still believe that the right system, the right habit, the right mindset shift will finally make you feel whole, this probably isn’t for you yet. And that’s okay. Go find what you need. Come back when it stops working.

This letter is not self-improvement. It is something else entirely.

Who this is for

This is for the person who has already been through the self-improvement machine and come out the other side with results. And still feels restless.

You fixed your external life. Discipline, productivity, goals. But your internal state is the same, or even worse than before. You still feel the weight of something unresolved. A quiet void that productivity hacks don’t touch. A loneliness that success doesn’t fill. An anxiety that morning routines can’t quiet.

You’re not looking for more tips. You’re looking for something deeper.

You just don’t know where to look, because everything you’ve been handed so far has been a variation of the same thing. In fact, it is the same thing sold to you with different names.

And that thing doesn’t quite hit the root.

You’ve been given different tools to build the same house.

This letter is for the person ready to question the blueprint.

How I got here

I went through the self-improvement phase. Genuinely. I read the books, watched the videos, applied the frameworks, saw the results. And then I hit the same wall you probably have: the external metrics improved, but something internal stayed stuck.

What changed things for me wasn’t another productivity system. It was stumbling onto Adlerian psychology, the work of Alfred Adler, a contemporary of Freud and Jung who got closer to the truth than either of them, and was promptly ignored for it.

Where most psychology asks what happened to you, Adler asks what you’re doing with it.

Where self-help treats symptoms, Adler goes after the root.

Your past is real. Your circumstances are real. But your response to them is yours. That’s not a motivational line. It’s a confrontation.

I’m not going to lecture you on Adler every week. But his lens is the ground this letter stands on.

What this letter actually is

Here’s my thesis, as simply as I can put it:

Every person has life-lies. Beliefs formed from your upbringing, your early experiences, the stories you built about yourself before you had the tools to question them. You chose them, but you chose them before you had the tools to know better. That’s not an excuse. It’s just where the work starts.

But you can correct those lies.

By moving out of the familiar. Questioning the beliefs you’ve built your life around. Doing the thing that actually scares you instead of the thing that looks like growth but feels comfortable.

All of that runs on one thing.

Courage.

Not motivation. Not mindset. Not a better morning routine. Courage.

Self-help talks about courage too, but here’s what it usually misses: most people in self-help are still inside the familiar. The content is familiar. The love they seek is familiar. The life-lies they believe feel like personality. The discomfort they’re willing to sit with is calibrated and safe.

Real growth requires stepping outside all of that. And you can only do that if you first see it, if you know where your familiar actually is.

That’s what this letter does. It shows you the familiar. It hands you the options. It doesn’t sugarcoat, and it doesn’t hold your hand.

The courageous part? That’s yours to do.

I’ll see you inside.